Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 00:30

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
How did Nickelback gain a large fan base despite criticism of their music?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Nintendo Switch 2 launch games: Every Switch 2 game available on day one - Video Games Chronicle
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Saints minicamp Day 1: QB battle still in full force - NewOrleans.Football
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
How can I watch porn on TikTok?
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Anxiety and anger may explain how parenting styles shape life satisfaction - PsyPost